Amanuensis Monday:- Digitisation of UK's birth, death & marriage certificates?

No Comments »

When researching in UK, we have several websites to choose from to collect numerous different records to support our online research.

The documents that are at the cornerstone of our research of course, are civil registration documents otherwise known as birth, death and marriage records (BDM), and census records.

We have extensive census record images already digitised from 1841 to 1911, that provide real insights into our ancestors lives.

However, they need to be backed up by the proof derived from civil registration documents. Civil registration started in 1837 in England and Wales, and from 1855 in Scotland. Prior to that we must look in parish registers for baptismal, marriage or funeral/burial records.

Birth certificates prove that the person existed, what their name was at birth, their date of birth, and the mothers' name; often also the fathers. Other information given, would be the area that the family lived in at time of birth. From 1911 mothers' maiden names are included.

George William BOOTHER (b1851)
m 1874
Margaret SULLIVAN (b1857)
Marriage certificates prove that the marriage happened, when and provide the spouse's name. Also provides occupation and addresses at time of event. Fathers are listed also along with their occupation. Scotland also provides mothers details.

The age at time of marriage must be taken with a pinch of salt, unless you have the birth certificate of the person to back it up.
No proof of identity was required and a person may lie about their age if they are not old enough to marry, or they may have another reason for not telling the truth - or they may not even be sure when they were born.

Sometimes names on marriage certificates can differ from that on a birth certificate. Changes of first and surnames since birth are common.

Names of witnesses on certificates are handy - often they are family members.

Death certificates prove that someone died, when and gives a reason why they died. It may tell you where they were living, and it will tell you who the "informant" was (who registered the death). The informant is often, but not always a family member. Sometimes it is a friend, or someone like a doctor or lawyer. The other details such as names, date of birth, occupation, marital status etc may be incorrect as the informant is providing details that they think might be correct - but not necessarily so. And of course, the deceased is unable to correct the info.

When searching for BDM events online for England and Wales, we get only the indexes to the civil registration documents.

These indexes are available on FindMyPast, Ancestry, The Genealogist and FreeBMD. They help narrow down our search but mustn't be used instead of the actual certificates themselves.

The indexes provide name, year, which "quarter", and which volume and page number to find the registration on and what registration district the event was registered in. This is to help you order the certificate you require.
George William BOOTHER
registered 2nd quarter (April-June) 1851
Shoreditch, Vol II, p453
Note - although registered in the 2nd quarter,
George was actually born on 8 March

An index is missing quite a lot of valuable information. Sometimes that actual event occurred in the quarter or even year previous, but was registered later. Sometimes there are multiple people with the same or similar names registered for that event around the same time.

You can't be sure without a copy of the registration that you have the correct person.

So if we have a civil registration event that we want a copy of, we currently need to take the information from indexes and order your English or Welsh certificate through the UK's General Register Office. It currently costs £9.25 per certificate and the site suggests approximately two or three weeks between ordering and receipt (although I've known it to take much longer).

Its fairly expensive, especially as genealogists and family historians only want the historic research value that the registration, rather than proving a legal identity by having a legally certified registration that is a certificate.

Scotland has a much better set-up for researchers by having their indexes and document images available for you to view and download online at their ScotlandsPeople website. Cost for viewing an index and an image is approximately £1.50, although you have to have purchased a minimum of £7 worth of credits first to get started.

It has its downsides, in that it is very easy to run out of credits very quickly if you aren't careful. But you do get instant gratification if you find what you want, and for a much cheaper £1.50 than England's £9.25.

Of course England and Wales have far more registrations to digitise than Scotland. But it seems that there is a move a-foot to do so with a call to sign a petition. Gould Genealogy blogged about this recently.

So, if like me, you would like the UK to digitise English and Welsh registrations, join me in signing the petition. Note you do have to be a British citizen (which includes ex-pats) and/or a UK resident.

And how awesome would it be if the New Zealand Government also decide to digitise its civil registrations too!

Happy hunting

Seonaid


Wisdom Wednesday: Migration to New Zealand: a guide for family history researchers by Christine Clement

No Comments »

I have recently been revising my talk on how to locate passenger lists for those of our ancestors who have just appeared in records here in New Zealand.

During the course of this preparation I have been using a variety of material available here in the library (Auckland Central) and one in particular I feel is worth mentioning as for a small work it is so full of useful information.



The booklet covers the period 1840-1970 and covers a lot of ground in its 64 pages.

On the back of the booklet Christine explains its purpose:

I am often asked how to find when an ancestor came to New Zealand. This set me off on an exploratory path a number of years ago putting together the different schemes, periods and times to find out just who the people were coming at the different time periods and why.
This booklet is designed to make readers think beyond the square to see what else was happening in the world that may have led people to New Zealand.
So, what sort of things are included?  The usual suspects of NZ Company, gold rushes, Waikato and Taranaki military settlers (Land Wars), assisted immigrants etc.  However, it is the sections on the settlement of particular places in New Zealand and schemes that brought immigrants to this country that are invaluable.  For instance, those who arrived due to the cotton famine in the UK, Small Farmers with Capital, Brogden’s Navvies, Moravian Settlement, Sedgwick Boys just to name a few.

I was particularly interested to read about Brogden’s Navvies. I now think this may be how relatives of my 2x Great Grandfather arrived and this has given me food for thought about further possible records to explore.

The booklet is indexed with a bibliography of material additional to those mentioned in the text.

Anybody who is interested in immigration records into New Zealand should find something of interest in this short work.  Perhaps worth considering as a Christmas present for the family historian in your family?

Migration to New Zealand: a guide for family history researchers by Christine Clement (published by Unlock the past, 2014, Australia)

Marie 

Friday Funny: Thwarting the descendants

No Comments »


In the field of family history it’s fair to say not everyone gets excited by shipping lists, birth certificates, parish registers, and military files. I don’t. I’ve had nightmares about such things. Well, actually, I haven’t, but working in Heritage I fully expect to one day, because it has crossed my mind many, many times that family history is just a legitimate form of stalking. Especially when the people aren’t even dead.

For those who have relatives – which would be pretty much everyone – it’s possible that one day you may be the victim of stalking by some great, great, great grand-person who decides they want to conduct a little “research” into their ancestors. You would be forgiven for thinking this is creepy.

But what’s to be done? What can you do to avoid this if you value your privacy, if you don’t particularly want people, even if they are related to you, poking into your business - even many, many, many decades after your demise? How can you throw this potential “researcher” off your trail and thwart him in his tracks?

I offer suggestions. Caveat: no living or dead person, in any capacity, other than the author, i.e. me, endorses these, and to be fair, even I have grave doubts about a few of them. But here goes…


First up. Spread rumours about yourself. One of the traps the “researcher” may fall in to is to believe the rumour, and analyse the nefarious titbit to the extent that they ignore the real stuff. A hidden spouse, a virgin birth, a secret baby, some folie a deux - these are all fabulous tropes, much like the plot of a romance novel. Fortunately in our enlightened times, the notion of morality is out the window, and in fact the opposite is to be celebrated, so go hither and create a scandal or two. Preferably with progeny. Just don’t get carried away and hurt anyone real although you, of course, may appear emotionally wrecked because of this supposed incident. That would be quite brilliant.

Second. Claim you were adopted. Admittedly, most of us grew out of that fantasy before high school, but you can resurrect it easily enough. Brainstorm with fellow family history-phobics. Plot your story. Have turning points and an inciting incident. Milk that conflict. Give it a black moment and do try and fit some sexual tension in there. Leave no stone unturned. Remember this is not lying. It is creating. Creation is good. And the sublime beauty of it is you don’t need proof. That’s for your ‘researcher’ to tear their hair out trying to find.

Third. Throw in lots of mentions of another country to set people on a false trail. It might pay to go there as well and take photos. Target some unsuspecting but very rich and attractive local and make sure you get plenty of selfies with them around.  Preserve the pics. This will arouse the suspicion of the future “researcher”. They won’t be able to sleep for trying to figure out what you were doing in this country, and who that person was, and do they, your descendant, in fact possess this mystery person’s DNA and quite possibly a claim on their fortune? Photobombing a local politician could work to your advantage, too.

Fourth. Stalk.
Now, settle down.  I know what you’re thinking. Hashtag hypocrite.

But we are not talking stalking a real person here, or any kind of harassment. (See New Zealand legal information). We are not even talking cyberstalking with fake Twitter and Facebook accounts. We are suggesting stalking a ‘thing’. For example – just throwing this out there – stalking rugby league.

For example, you genuinely loathe league, loathe it passionately, and everyone knows it. What better way to arouse the suspicious mind of your future relative than to start quietly admiring it, and most of all documenting this perplexing admiration but without giving a sufficiently believable explanation. You head off to games. At work you start throwing around phrases like “goal line dropout,”  “knock on” and “credit to the boys.” You have www.nrl.com.au in your desktop favourites. You appear at press conferences with a fraudulent media pass. (I have no clue how that happens but I’m sure you can figure it out.)

Sir George Grey Special Collections, Auckland Libraries, AWNS-19190717-40-1
Be diligent with your documentation so the future “researcher” latches on to this, suspicion mounts, over-thinking will occur, scenarios begin to haunt them at 2am rendering them useless at the day job. The point? That you have something to hide. That there is some dark, possibly deviant family secret lurking just out of reach, something you’ve never admitted to although this “researcher” just knows the puzzle is waiting to be solved. Family historians thrive on this kind of torture, this chase for the truth. Visualise yourself rubbing your spiritual hands together from the grave, or wherever it is they have disposed of your remains in years to come.

Fifth, and finally, this is a biggie. You must record fake death bed confessions even if you are young with no discernible health issues. In some circles this is known as oral history. It behoves you, if you are indeed serious about thwarting this blood related “researcher,” to cover all bases. It would be helpful to leave the recording with your lawyer: this information coming out prior to your demise would totally jeopardise your scheming and unravel horrifically and possibly quite humiliatingly, in front of you.  But exercise caution with your confessions. Your future “researcher” might be able to sniff out crazy. Just give them enough to tantalise. To set them off down a long and winding road from which they might never return.

That, then, should do it, so that you go to your grave confident your future relations have no idea who they’re actually dealing with.

And remember this. Biography is fact. Autobiography is fiction. 

Go forth, create, and thwart.

Joanne Graves